<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206833</link>
    <description>Interest under section 27(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 was leviable where the dealer failed to disclose flight-kitchen sales to foreign airlines in the returns. The Court held that liability to interest arises when full tax due is not paid on a return that is correct, complete and bona fide; the issue is not a mere mismatch between assessed and returned turnover. On the facts, the assessee knew of an advance ruling treating similar supplies as local sales, had earlier paid local sales tax on such transactions, and nonetheless omitted the turnover while creating a delivery order to support export treatment. The omission made the return incomplete and incorrect, so the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206833</link>
      <description>Interest under section 27(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 was leviable where the dealer failed to disclose flight-kitchen sales to foreign airlines in the returns. The Court held that liability to interest arises when full tax due is not paid on a return that is correct, complete and bona fide; the issue is not a mere mismatch between assessed and returned turnover. On the facts, the assessee knew of an advance ruling treating similar supplies as local sales, had earlier paid local sales tax on such transactions, and nonetheless omitted the turnover while creating a delivery order to support export treatment. The omission made the return incomplete and incorrect, so the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>