https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206823 Anti-dumping final findings were challenged on the ground that the hearing was conducted by one authority but the findings were issued by a successor authority, raising a natural justice objection under Rule 6(6) of the Anti-dumping Rules, 1995. The court noted that the grievance had substance but declined to entertain the writ petition because an effective statutory appeal was available under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The challenge was therefore left to the appellate authority, and the writ remedy was not invoked in preference to the alternate statutory remedy. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206823 Anti-dumping final findings were challenged on the ground that the hearing was conducted by one authority but the findings were issued by a successor authority, raising a natural justice objection under Rule 6(6) of the Anti-dumping Rules, 1995. The court noted that the grievance had substance but declined to entertain the writ petition because an effective statutory appeal was available under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The challenge was therefore left to the appellate authority, and the writ remedy was not invoked in preference to the alternate statutory remedy. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206823