<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 697 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal found that the VRS scheme conformed with Rule 2BA and that the company acted in good faith regarding TDS deductions. The company was not treated as in default for non-deduction of tax at source, and interest under Section 201(1A) was charged as necessary. The appeals were dismissed on 22.10.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 697 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. The Tribunal found that the VRS scheme conformed with Rule 2BA and that the company acted in good faith regarding TDS deductions. The company was not treated as in default for non-deduction of tax at source, and interest under Section 201(1A) was charged as necessary. The appeals were dismissed on 22.10.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>