<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 167 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) after finding the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred unjustified. The Tribunal emphasized the assessing authority&#039;s failure to issue a speaking order as required by law and provided the appellant with an opportunity for a hearing. The appeal was set aside and disposed of by way of remand for a fresh decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 167 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) after finding the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred unjustified. The Tribunal emphasized the assessing authority&#039;s failure to issue a speaking order as required by law and provided the appellant with an opportunity for a hearing. The appeal was set aside and disposed of by way of remand for a fresh decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>