<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 530 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206788</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 96-ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is described as mandatory once duty is not paid by the stipulated date, with liability extending to the outstanding duty, interest and a penalty equal to the duty outstanding or Rs. 5,000, whichever is greater. The text says the mandatory wording leaves no discretion to scale down the penalty after the rule is attracted. It also notes that the same approach was applied to the analogous penalty scheme under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, where the statutory conditions were treated as excluding discretion in quantifying penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 530 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206788</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 96-ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is described as mandatory once duty is not paid by the stipulated date, with liability extending to the outstanding duty, interest and a penalty equal to the duty outstanding or Rs. 5,000, whichever is greater. The text says the mandatory wording leaves no discretion to scale down the penalty after the rule is attracted. It also notes that the same approach was applied to the analogous penalty scheme under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, where the statutory conditions were treated as excluding discretion in quantifying penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>