<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 640 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Service Tax on parking charges related to Mandap Keeper services, confirming interest and imposing penalties under Section 78. The appellants were given the option to pay the entire demand with interest and 25% of the penalty within 30 days to avoid further penalties. Failure to comply would result in a 100% penalty on the confirmed Service Tax demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 640 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Service Tax on parking charges related to Mandap Keeper services, confirming interest and imposing penalties under Section 78. The appellants were given the option to pay the entire demand with interest and 25% of the penalty within 30 days to avoid further penalties. Failure to comply would result in a 100% penalty on the confirmed Service Tax demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>