<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 639 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206766</link>
    <description>Service tax exemption was available for containers supplied to SEZ units for authorised operations, even where the containers were used partly outside the Special Economic Zone. Notification No. 4/2004-ST was read harmoniously with section 26 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 and Rule 31 of the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006, which extend exemption to taxable services provided to a Developer or Unit for authorised operations. The regime does not require exclusive consumption of the service within the Zone. On that basis, the supply of containers to SEZ units fell within the exemption and the service tax demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 639 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206766</link>
      <description>Service tax exemption was available for containers supplied to SEZ units for authorised operations, even where the containers were used partly outside the Special Economic Zone. Notification No. 4/2004-ST was read harmoniously with section 26 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 and Rule 31 of the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006, which extend exemption to taxable services provided to a Developer or Unit for authorised operations. The regime does not require exclusive consumption of the service within the Zone. On that basis, the supply of containers to SEZ units fell within the exemption and the service tax demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>