https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206761 A prohibition order against a Customs House Agent must rest on disclosed material showing the specific breach of the governing obligations and must be issued under the correct regulatory power. A bare allegation without particulars of the dates or evidence relied upon denies effective notice and a meaningful opportunity to respond. Reliance on the wrong regulation, including reference to suspension when no suspension order exists, indicates non-application of mind. On that basis, the impugned order was held illegal and quashed, while leaving the authority free to issue a fresh order in accordance with the proper regulation. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206761 A prohibition order against a Customs House Agent must rest on disclosed material showing the specific breach of the governing obligations and must be issued under the correct regulatory power. A bare allegation without particulars of the dates or evidence relied upon denies effective notice and a meaningful opportunity to respond. Reliance on the wrong regulation, including reference to suspension when no suspension order exists, indicates non-application of mind. On that basis, the impugned order was held illegal and quashed, while leaving the authority free to issue a fresh order in accordance with the proper regulation. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206761