https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206758 The judge acknowledged the appellant's mistake in misrepresenting facts regarding service tax payment for the corporate office rent. The judge remanded the issue, waiving the pre-deposit requirement, emphasizing the need to assess the admissibility of Cenvat credit on such service tax. The appellant agreed to deposit 50% of the tax demanded, leading to the matter being remanded to the original adjudicating authority for compliance and further adjudication. The judgment underscores the importance of accurate representation of facts and proper consideration of Cenvat credit admissibility, ensuring fairness and compliance in tax matters. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206758 The judge acknowledged the appellant's mistake in misrepresenting facts regarding service tax payment for the corporate office rent. The judge remanded the issue, waiving the pre-deposit requirement, emphasizing the need to assess the admissibility of Cenvat credit on such service tax. The appellant agreed to deposit 50% of the tax demanded, leading to the matter being remanded to the original adjudicating authority for compliance and further adjudication. The judgment underscores the importance of accurate representation of facts and proper consideration of Cenvat credit admissibility, ensuring fairness and compliance in tax matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206758