<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 634 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order for confiscation of re-rollable scrap under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision distinguished between heavy melting scrap and re-rollable scrap, affirming the examination findings. The imposed fine and penalty were deemed appropriate, with no modification warranted. The appeal against the confiscation was rejected, maintaining the original order in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 634 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order for confiscation of re-rollable scrap under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision distinguished between heavy melting scrap and re-rollable scrap, affirming the examination findings. The imposed fine and penalty were deemed appropriate, with no modification warranted. The appeal against the confiscation was rejected, maintaining the original order in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>