<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 131 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206715</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the appeals and framed substantial questions of law regarding the legitimacy of the jewellery business, deletion of additions on account of cash and commission income, and deletion of interest charged under Section 158BFA(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals were consolidated for a comprehensive examination of the evidence and material presented before the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 131 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206715</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the appeals and framed substantial questions of law regarding the legitimacy of the jewellery business, deletion of additions on account of cash and commission income, and deletion of interest charged under Section 158BFA(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals were consolidated for a comprehensive examination of the evidence and material presented before the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>