<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 628 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 as it was not mentioned in the show cause notice, depriving the appellant of a chance to defend. The penalty under Section 76 was waived due to the appellant&#039;s good faith in light of legal uncertainties. However, the penalty under Section 77 for failure to register was upheld. The Tribunal directed verification of education cess payments for accurate assessment, emphasizing procedural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 628 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 as it was not mentioned in the show cause notice, depriving the appellant of a chance to defend. The penalty under Section 76 was waived due to the appellant&#039;s good faith in light of legal uncertainties. However, the penalty under Section 77 for failure to register was upheld. The Tribunal directed verification of education cess payments for accurate assessment, emphasizing procedural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>