<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 36 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of customs duty of Rs. 66,71,998/- on crude Palm Stearine, along with interest, and imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 37.50 lakhs. A penalty of Rs. 66,71,998/- was imposed on the appellant under section 112(a) of the Customs Act. All other dues adjudged against the appellant were set aside, and the penalty on the General Manager was also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 36 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of customs duty of Rs. 66,71,998/- on crude Palm Stearine, along with interest, and imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 37.50 lakhs. A penalty of Rs. 66,71,998/- was imposed on the appellant under section 112(a) of the Customs Act. All other dues adjudged against the appellant were set aside, and the penalty on the General Manager was also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>