<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 556 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206700</link>
    <description>Prima facie limitation and revenue neutrality were treated as sufficient grounds to waive pre-deposit. The Tribunal noted that extended limitation requires material showing mala fide suppression, and that a mere expectation of fuller disclosure under self-assessment is not enough; in the absence of such material, the limitation objection had prima facie force. It also accepted the revenue neutrality plea on a prima facie basis, relying on the duty position arising from the mode of clearance and exemption consequences, as well as an earlier majority view. Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and the stay application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 556 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206700</link>
      <description>Prima facie limitation and revenue neutrality were treated as sufficient grounds to waive pre-deposit. The Tribunal noted that extended limitation requires material showing mala fide suppression, and that a mere expectation of fuller disclosure under self-assessment is not enough; in the absence of such material, the limitation objection had prima facie force. It also accepted the revenue neutrality plea on a prima facie basis, relying on the duty position arising from the mode of clearance and exemption consequences, as well as an earlier majority view. Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted and the stay application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>