https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206690 The court found the appeal maintainable under Rule 86 despite a typographical error in mentioning Rule 65, allowing challenges to non-conclusive orders. Precedents supported appealability of sale confirmation orders. Regarding the limitation period, the appeal was deemed timely filed as it commenced from the date of order communication. The court quashed the Commissioner's decision and instructed a prompt appeal review. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206690 The court found the appeal maintainable under Rule 86 despite a typographical error in mentioning Rule 65, allowing challenges to non-conclusive orders. Precedents supported appealability of sale confirmation orders. Regarding the limitation period, the appeal was deemed timely filed as it commenced from the date of order communication. The court quashed the Commissioner's decision and instructed a prompt appeal review. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206690