<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 361 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206686</link>
    <description>HC held that proceedings under s.147/148 were invalid for want of jurisdiction and quashed them. The AO relied solely on an annexure alleging allotment of shares to a purported company; the court found that entity to be non-existent/fictitious and therefore the statutory preconditions for reopening assessment under s.147 were not satisfied. Consequently the writ petition was allowed and the s.148 proceedings were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 361 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206686</link>
      <description>HC held that proceedings under s.147/148 were invalid for want of jurisdiction and quashed them. The AO relied solely on an annexure alleging allotment of shares to a purported company; the court found that entity to be non-existent/fictitious and therefore the statutory preconditions for reopening assessment under s.147 were not satisfied. Consequently the writ petition was allowed and the s.148 proceedings were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>