<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 125 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of all aspects raised during the appeal. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present their arguments, with a focus on ensuring a fair and thorough examination of the issues involved. The original authority was directed to re-examine the matter in light of the arguments presented and to make a fresh decision considering all relevant points.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 125 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of all aspects raised during the appeal. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present their arguments, with a focus on ensuring a fair and thorough examination of the issues involved. The original authority was directed to re-examine the matter in light of the arguments presented and to make a fresh decision considering all relevant points.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>