<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 360 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the predeposit requirement and finalized appeals based on the Karnataka High Court&#039;s ruling that transportation charges up to 1.4.2008 are considered &quot;input service.&quot; Cases of M/s. India Cements Ltd., M/s. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd., and M/s. Wheels India Ltd. covering both pre and post-1.4.2008 were remitted for fresh decisions. M/s. Wheels India Ltd.&#039;s case entirely post-1.4.2008 had orders set aside for a new decision. M/s. Madras Cements Ltd.&#039;s case was also remitted for a fresh decision considering pre and post-1.4.2008 periods. All appeals were allowed via remand, ensuring transparency and procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 360 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the predeposit requirement and finalized appeals based on the Karnataka High Court&#039;s ruling that transportation charges up to 1.4.2008 are considered &quot;input service.&quot; Cases of M/s. India Cements Ltd., M/s. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd., and M/s. Wheels India Ltd. covering both pre and post-1.4.2008 were remitted for fresh decisions. M/s. Wheels India Ltd.&#039;s case entirely post-1.4.2008 had orders set aside for a new decision. M/s. Madras Cements Ltd.&#039;s case was also remitted for a fresh decision considering pre and post-1.4.2008 periods. All appeals were allowed via remand, ensuring transparency and procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>