<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 122 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206656</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in an appeal against service tax demand on construction activities for a stadium and shopping complex. The appellants were not liable to pay service tax for the stadium construction but were directed to pay for the shopping complex. The Tribunal remanded the matter for re-quantification of service tax related to the shopping complex construction and tasked the Commissioner with determining any penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 122 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206656</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in an appeal against service tax demand on construction activities for a stadium and shopping complex. The appellants were not liable to pay service tax for the stadium construction but were directed to pay for the shopping complex. The Tribunal remanded the matter for re-quantification of service tax related to the shopping complex construction and tasked the Commissioner with determining any penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>