<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 552 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt the municipal value for determining the annual value of the property not let out. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the ad-hoc disallowance of expenses made by the Assessing Officer, finding it reasonable given the lack of proper substantiation by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 552 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt the municipal value for determining the annual value of the property not let out. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the ad-hoc disallowance of expenses made by the Assessing Officer, finding it reasonable given the lack of proper substantiation by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>