<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 426 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206630</link>
    <description>Voluntary payment of service tax and interest after liability was clarified, without any prior investigation or show-cause notice, was treated as falling within Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. On those facts, the penalty was held to be unsustainable because the assessee had approached the departmental authorities on its own and discharged the dues promptly. The penalty was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 426 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206630</link>
      <description>Voluntary payment of service tax and interest after liability was clarified, without any prior investigation or show-cause notice, was treated as falling within Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. On those facts, the penalty was held to be unsustainable because the assessee had approached the departmental authorities on its own and discharged the dues promptly. The penalty was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>