<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 20 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206614</link>
    <description>The Authority held that the $70 million compensation paid by Satyam to the applicant is a capital receipt, with a portion attributable to royalty being taxable. The Assessing Officer is to determine the taxable portion. Additionally, the interest earned on the escrow account is deemed taxable in India. The ruling was issued on 12th October 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 20 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206614</link>
      <description>The Authority held that the $70 million compensation paid by Satyam to the applicant is a capital receipt, with a portion attributable to royalty being taxable. The Assessing Officer is to determine the taxable portion. Additionally, the interest earned on the escrow account is deemed taxable in India. The ruling was issued on 12th October 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>