<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 4 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206612</link>
    <description>HC held that expenditure on purchase of software applications was to be treated in favour of the assessee (not disallowed as capital), following precedent. Expenditure on improvements to leasehold premises was characterized as current repairs/maintenance and allowed as revenue expenditure under section 30. The court therefore allowed the deductions claimed for software purchases and leasehold repairs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 4 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206612</link>
      <description>HC held that expenditure on purchase of software applications was to be treated in favour of the assessee (not disallowed as capital), following precedent. Expenditure on improvements to leasehold premises was characterized as current repairs/maintenance and allowed as revenue expenditure under section 30. The court therefore allowed the deductions claimed for software purchases and leasehold repairs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>