<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 514 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the lands in question were agricultural lands, not capital assets, as per Section 2(14)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The sale was not deemed an adventure in the nature of trade, as the lands were used for agricultural purposes and remained in their original state. The gains from the sale were consequently not taxable under the Act, leading to the dismissal of all revenue appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 514 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the lands in question were agricultural lands, not capital assets, as per Section 2(14)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The sale was not deemed an adventure in the nature of trade, as the lands were used for agricultural purposes and remained in their original state. The gains from the sale were consequently not taxable under the Act, leading to the dismissal of all revenue appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>