<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 736 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206606</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the reassessment was valid as there was a reason to believe income had escaped assessment, emphasizing that mere production of documents does not constitute full disclosure. The court highlighted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were within the limitation period, and the alleged non-disclosure of material facts during the original assessment justified the reopening. The court indicated that the merits of the additions would be evaluated in the finalization of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 736 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206606</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the reassessment was valid as there was a reason to believe income had escaped assessment, emphasizing that mere production of documents does not constitute full disclosure. The court highlighted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were within the limitation period, and the alleged non-disclosure of material facts during the original assessment justified the reopening. The court indicated that the merits of the additions would be evaluated in the finalization of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>