<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 689 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206605</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, addressing disallowances and additions related to repair and maintenance expenses, club membership fees, interest charged under section 234C, and notional interest. The ITAT differentiated between revenue and capital expenditures, following legal precedents and tax laws interpretations. The decision emphasized consistency and adherence to previous rulings, ultimately leading to the dismissal of certain grounds raised by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 689 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206605</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals, addressing disallowances and additions related to repair and maintenance expenses, club membership fees, interest charged under section 234C, and notional interest. The ITAT differentiated between revenue and capital expenditures, following legal precedents and tax laws interpretations. The decision emphasized consistency and adherence to previous rulings, ultimately leading to the dismissal of certain grounds raised by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>