<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 114 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206602</link>
    <description>HC held that where the assessee paid the service tax and interest for delayed payments and furnished that information before issuance of any show-cause notice, Sub-sec. (3) of Sec. 73 bars the authorities from issuing notices under Sub-sec. (1) in respect of the amounts so paid. Consequently, the authorities lacked jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings under Sec. 76 in respect of those amounts, and the appeals were dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 114 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206602</link>
      <description>HC held that where the assessee paid the service tax and interest for delayed payments and furnished that information before issuance of any show-cause notice, Sub-sec. (3) of Sec. 73 bars the authorities from issuing notices under Sub-sec. (1) in respect of the amounts so paid. Consequently, the authorities lacked jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings under Sec. 76 in respect of those amounts, and the appeals were dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>