<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 354 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the original authority to verify the inclusion of the cost of dies and moulds in the final product on a pro-rata basis. The issue of limitation was to be comprehensively addressed, considering all relevant facts. The appellants were allowed to rely on precedent decisions, and the appeal was granted for further examination and clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 354 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the original authority to verify the inclusion of the cost of dies and moulds in the final product on a pro-rata basis. The issue of limitation was to be comprehensively addressed, considering all relevant facts. The appellants were allowed to rely on precedent decisions, and the appeal was granted for further examination and clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>