<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 744 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Rs.1 lakh penalty imposed on the appellants for violating Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellants rectified the duty payment default without being prompted by authorities, indicating no mens rea. Citing Section 11A(2B) and a precedent, the Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable due to the absence of deliberate default. Interest and penalties were deemed unwarranted, leading to the disposal of the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 744 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Rs.1 lakh penalty imposed on the appellants for violating Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellants rectified the duty payment default without being prompted by authorities, indicating no mens rea. Citing Section 11A(2B) and a precedent, the Tribunal found the penalty unsustainable due to the absence of deliberate default. Interest and penalties were deemed unwarranted, leading to the disposal of the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>