<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 628 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had provided all necessary details and documents to substantiate its claims, and the AO had failed to bring any contrary evidence on record. The Tribunal relied on the principles laid down in &#039;CIT vs. Lovely Exports&#039; and other relevant case laws to conclude that the additions were not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 628 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had provided all necessary details and documents to substantiate its claims, and the AO had failed to bring any contrary evidence on record. The Tribunal relied on the principles laid down in &#039;CIT vs. Lovely Exports&#039; and other relevant case laws to conclude that the additions were not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>