<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 742 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit on duty paid for capital goods transferred between units was time-barred as the show-cause notice did not allege suppression, fraud, or collusion by the assessee within the statutory timeline. Relying on relevant case laws and Supreme Court judgments, the Tribunal set aside the demands for reversal, penalties, and interest, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The importance of adhering to statutory timelines in such matters was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 742 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit on duty paid for capital goods transferred between units was time-barred as the show-cause notice did not allege suppression, fraud, or collusion by the assessee within the statutory timeline. Relying on relevant case laws and Supreme Court judgments, the Tribunal set aside the demands for reversal, penalties, and interest, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The importance of adhering to statutory timelines in such matters was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>