<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 741 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and granted the refund claim of Rs. 2,93,855/- as the appellant successfully demonstrated, through the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and project authority&#039;s certificate, that the duty burden was not passed on to customers. The Tribunal found no challenge to the veracity of these certificates and set aside the previous order rejecting the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 741 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and granted the refund claim of Rs. 2,93,855/- as the appellant successfully demonstrated, through the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and project authority&#039;s certificate, that the duty burden was not passed on to customers. The Tribunal found no challenge to the veracity of these certificates and set aside the previous order rejecting the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>