<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206564</link>
    <description>An appeal was not maintainable where the appellant sought no actionable relief against the respondents and instead attempted to pursue relief against co-noticees who were not impleaded. The Tribunal noted that the adjudication order had confirmed demands and penalties only against the respondents, while penalties against the co-noticees had been dropped. As the Revenue&#039;s appeal effectively targeted persons who were not parties before the Tribunal, and no relief was actually claimed against the respondents, the appeal could not be entertained and was rejected at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206564</link>
      <description>An appeal was not maintainable where the appellant sought no actionable relief against the respondents and instead attempted to pursue relief against co-noticees who were not impleaded. The Tribunal noted that the adjudication order had confirmed demands and penalties only against the respondents, while penalties against the co-noticees had been dropped. As the Revenue&#039;s appeal effectively targeted persons who were not parties before the Tribunal, and no relief was actually claimed against the respondents, the appeal could not be entertained and was rejected at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>