https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206551 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of one appellant entirely and partially for others, focusing on the limitation period and penalty issues. Demands exceeding the limitation period were deemed time-barred, and penalties were waived due to the appellants' legitimate belief about service tax liability. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of demands within the limitation period, treating the value as cum duty price. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the appellants' bonafide belief and reasonable cause for not discharging service tax liability. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206551 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of one appellant entirely and partially for others, focusing on the limitation period and penalty issues. Demands exceeding the limitation period were deemed time-barred, and penalties were waived due to the appellants' legitimate belief about service tax liability. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of demands within the limitation period, treating the value as cum duty price. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the appellants' bonafide belief and reasonable cause for not discharging service tax liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206551