https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206550 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning Service Tax liability on the supply of manpower to M/s BHEL. The appellants successfully argued that the workers remained on their payroll and were not directly recruited by M/s BHEL, supported by tribunal decisions and a circular. The tribunal found that the Revenue failed to counter the appellants' contentions and ruled in favor of the appellants based on precedent, allowing three of the appeals. This case highlights the significance of legal interpretation and precedent in determining tax obligations in similar scenarios. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206550 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning Service Tax liability on the supply of manpower to M/s BHEL. The appellants successfully argued that the workers remained on their payroll and were not directly recruited by M/s BHEL, supported by tribunal decisions and a circular. The tribunal found that the Revenue failed to counter the appellants' contentions and ruled in favor of the appellants based on precedent, allowing three of the appeals. This case highlights the significance of legal interpretation and precedent in determining tax obligations in similar scenarios. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206550