<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 739 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206541</link>
    <description>Delay in filing an appeal under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989 is condonable only on sufficient cause, measured from communication of the order. Although the initial explanation for the seven-day delay was found inaccurate and inadequate because it did not account for the time after receipt of the authenticated copy, later material showed that the authority had first accepted the order and then decided to challenge it on revenue grounds. That additional material supplied sufficient cause, and the delay was condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 739 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206541</link>
      <description>Delay in filing an appeal under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989 is condonable only on sufficient cause, measured from communication of the order. Although the initial explanation for the seven-day delay was found inaccurate and inadequate because it did not account for the time after receipt of the authenticated copy, later material showed that the authority had first accepted the order and then decided to challenge it on revenue grounds. That additional material supplied sufficient cause, and the delay was condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>