<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 509 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s revision under Section 263, deeming the original assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The &#039;One time technology transfer fees&#039; were held fully taxable in the year of receipt, rejecting spreading over five years. No deductions for future expenses related to the fees were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to conduct proper inquiries, dismissing the appeal and affirming the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 509 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s revision under Section 263, deeming the original assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The &#039;One time technology transfer fees&#039; were held fully taxable in the year of receipt, rejecting spreading over five years. No deductions for future expenses related to the fees were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to conduct proper inquiries, dismissing the appeal and affirming the CIT&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>