<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 605 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206535</link>
    <description>The High Court considered various issues related to the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer on the sale of jewellery. It assessed the justification of the ITAT&#039;s decision, the acceptance of previous orders, and the genuineness of the sale of jewellery by the assessee. The Court also examined the individual genuineness of the capital loss claim. Ultimately, the High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, remanding the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 605 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206535</link>
      <description>The High Court considered various issues related to the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer on the sale of jewellery. It assessed the justification of the ITAT&#039;s decision, the acceptance of previous orders, and the genuineness of the sale of jewellery by the assessee. The Court also examined the individual genuineness of the capital loss claim. Ultimately, the High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, remanding the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>