<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 627 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as the additions were sustained on estimates and probabilities, leading to the cancellation of the penalty related to jewellery and construction expenses. The appeal was partly allowed, and the penalty of Rs. 2,49,150 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 627 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as the additions were sustained on estimates and probabilities, leading to the cancellation of the penalty related to jewellery and construction expenses. The appeal was partly allowed, and the penalty of Rs. 2,49,150 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>