<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 730 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206517</link>
    <description>The miscellaneous application for withdrawal of appeal No.E/874/10 is allowed, leading to the appeal being dismissed as withdrawn. The applications for condonation of delay in filing supplementary appeals (No.E/875-876/10) are dismissed due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to comply with the Bench&#039;s directions promptly. The judge criticizes the Revenue&#039;s lackadaisical approach and emphasizes the importance of timely compliance with court instructions. The dismissal of the supplementary appeals underscores the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines for the proper administration of justice. Appeal No.E/839/08 is directed to be listed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 730 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206517</link>
      <description>The miscellaneous application for withdrawal of appeal No.E/874/10 is allowed, leading to the appeal being dismissed as withdrawn. The applications for condonation of delay in filing supplementary appeals (No.E/875-876/10) are dismissed due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to comply with the Bench&#039;s directions promptly. The judge criticizes the Revenue&#039;s lackadaisical approach and emphasizes the importance of timely compliance with court instructions. The dismissal of the supplementary appeals underscores the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines for the proper administration of justice. Appeal No.E/839/08 is directed to be listed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>