<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 536 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206509</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The tribunal upheld the deduction of 90% of lease rental income as an independent item of income and treated interest income as business income, allowing the deduction of 90% of it. The matter concerning netting of lease rental income after depreciation was remanded back to the CIT(A) for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 536 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206509</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The tribunal upheld the deduction of 90% of lease rental income as an independent item of income and treated interest income as business income, allowing the deduction of 90% of it. The matter concerning netting of lease rental income after depreciation was remanded back to the CIT(A) for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>