https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206498 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, due to the appellant's failure to comply with the directive to pre-deposit a specified amount within the given timeframe. The tribunal rejected the modification application seeking relief from the pre-deposit order, citing the appellant's inability to establish a prima facie case for modification based on financial hardships and export obligation discharge proof. Lack of new evidence or changed circumstances led to the rejection of the modification application, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the Customs Act. en-us Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206498 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, due to the appellant's failure to comply with the directive to pre-deposit a specified amount within the given timeframe. The tribunal rejected the modification application seeking relief from the pre-deposit order, citing the appellant's inability to establish a prima facie case for modification based on financial hardships and export obligation discharge proof. Lack of new evidence or changed circumstances led to the rejection of the modification application, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206498