<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 367 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206486</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded to the Assessing Officer or CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification and adherence to legal precedents in deciding the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 367 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206486</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded to the Assessing Officer or CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification and adherence to legal precedents in deciding the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>