<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 684 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part. The deduction under section 80-IA(4)(iii) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07 was granted, as the units were deemed ready even if not operational by the specified date. However, the claim for a deduction of Rs. 25 lakhs based on sworn statements during a survey was dismissed, as it lacked substantiation with details of Work-in-Progress.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 684 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part. The deduction under section 80-IA(4)(iii) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07 was granted, as the units were deemed ready even if not operational by the specified date. However, the claim for a deduction of Rs. 25 lakhs based on sworn statements during a survey was dismissed, as it lacked substantiation with details of Work-in-Progress.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>