<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 600 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit the service tax amount within a specified period, with waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the penalty amount upon compliance. The judgment emphasized the importance of paying service tax on the entire gross amount collected from customers, including reimbursable expenses, and highlighted the consequences of suppressing material facts in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 600 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit the service tax amount within a specified period, with waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the penalty amount upon compliance. The judgment emphasized the importance of paying service tax on the entire gross amount collected from customers, including reimbursable expenses, and highlighted the consequences of suppressing material facts in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>