<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 341 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206471</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the condonation of a short delay in filing the appeal by the Revenue due to circumstances related to the transfer of Commissioners. Additionally, the tribunal decided to remand both appeals to the original adjudicating authority based on previous orders and the similarity of issues, without delving into the merits of the appeal or the Commissioner (Appeals) authority to remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 341 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206471</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the condonation of a short delay in filing the appeal by the Revenue due to circumstances related to the transfer of Commissioners. Additionally, the tribunal decided to remand both appeals to the original adjudicating authority based on previous orders and the similarity of issues, without delving into the merits of the appeal or the Commissioner (Appeals) authority to remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>