<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 336 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties and fines in a case involving excess ceramic glazed tiles found during transit checks and factory visits. Despite discrepancies in quantity calculations, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs.1.25 lakhs and the penalty to Rs.1 lakh, indicating leniency while affirming the penalties. The appellant&#039;s appeal was rejected based on the suspicion of clandestine removal due to interception circumstances, even though evidence of such intentions was disputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 336 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties and fines in a case involving excess ceramic glazed tiles found during transit checks and factory visits. Despite discrepancies in quantity calculations, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs.1.25 lakhs and the penalty to Rs.1 lakh, indicating leniency while affirming the penalties. The appellant&#039;s appeal was rejected based on the suspicion of clandestine removal due to interception circumstances, even though evidence of such intentions was disputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>