<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 597 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting them the benefit of cenvat credit for service tax paid on clearing agent and forwarding agent services utilized for export purposes. The Tribunal held that these services qualify as valid input services for modvat credit, extending the place of removal to the port area. The previous decisions, including Nirma Ltd. Vs. CCE Bhavnagar and CCE Rajkot Vs. Adani Pharma Chem. Pvt. Ltd., supported this conclusion. The impugned order denying the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief for the appellant, ensuring consistency in tax treatment for similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 597 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting them the benefit of cenvat credit for service tax paid on clearing agent and forwarding agent services utilized for export purposes. The Tribunal held that these services qualify as valid input services for modvat credit, extending the place of removal to the port area. The previous decisions, including Nirma Ltd. Vs. CCE Bhavnagar and CCE Rajkot Vs. Adani Pharma Chem. Pvt. Ltd., supported this conclusion. The impugned order denying the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief for the appellant, ensuring consistency in tax treatment for similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>