<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 410 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority due to the appellant&#039;s lack of defense and potential grounds for leniency. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the appellant to have a reasonable opportunity to present their case and highlighted the importance of observing natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was sent back for a decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 410 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority due to the appellant&#039;s lack of defense and potential grounds for leniency. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the appellant to have a reasonable opportunity to present their case and highlighted the importance of observing natural justice principles. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was sent back for a decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>