https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206401 Construction-service abatement under the relevant notifications had to be computed on the gross amount charged, and the free supply of cement and steel by clients did not justify denial of the prescribed 67% abatement. The Tribunal also noted that a newly raised plea that the contracts were works contracts, coupled with the assessee's sales tax and VAT treatment, required fresh examination because it could affect the taxable classification under commercial or industrial construction service and construction of complex service. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration. en-us Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206401 Construction-service abatement under the relevant notifications had to be computed on the gross amount charged, and the free supply of cement and steel by clients did not justify denial of the prescribed 67% abatement. The Tribunal also noted that a newly raised plea that the contracts were works contracts, coupled with the assessee's sales tax and VAT treatment, required fresh examination because it could affect the taxable classification under commercial or industrial construction service and construction of complex service. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206401